Social Health Determinants Assignment
Task description:
Students are required to extend on assessment one and provide a narrative analysis in report format, addressing the following key points…
1. Identify and discuss
(a) How the social determinants of health underpin the narrative/s expressed in your chosen episode and
(b) How these social determinants of health have the potential to impact health outcomes of those individuals, with evidence from the broader social determinants of health literature. A template will be provided to complete this work.
- Using the short answer question template provided reflect on this experience of listening and analysing other peoples narratives and how it may impact/influence your professional practice moving forward.
Word count:
700 words (+/-10%)
Addresses learning outcome(s):
On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:
1. Recognise strength in self, others and communities;
2. Develop the ability to examine reflexively with narratives of illness and well-being using diverse media;
3. Recognise and discuss strengths and capabilities of individuals and communities;
4. Recognise and explain the importance of reflexive engagement in professional practice;
6. Respectfully discuss Australian stories of vulnerability and growth; especially with regard to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Social Health Determinants Assignment
Rubric
Media narratives analysis part 2
| Media narratives analysis part 2 |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 1
Communicates clearly using the template the social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted.
The reader of the template can clearly see the social determinants that underpin the narratives being presented.
The writing in this section follows academic conventions with sentence structure, grammar and spelling, and adheres to word count. |
| 10 to >8.4 Pts
High Distinction
Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are identified comprehensively demonstrating the student’s engagement with and sophisticated understanding of the unit concepts. Template depth and presentation exceeds expectations. Academic expression is articulate and very well developed. |
8.4 to >7.4 Pts
Distinction
Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are identified, demonstrating a very good understanding and application of unit concepts. Template is clearly presented, Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are thoroughly considered and presented effectively to the reader. Academic expression is articulate and well developed. |
7.4 to >6.4 Pts
Credit
(6.5-7.4) Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are identified, demonstrating a good understanding and application of unit concepts. Template is clearly presented. Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are presented effectively to the reader. Academic expression enables the social determinants to be explored with clarity, some errors in grammar or spelling may be noted. |
6.4 to >5.0 Pts
Pass
Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are identified, demonstrating a surface understanding and application of unit concepts. Template is clearly presented for the most part. |
5 to >0 Pts
Fail
Social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted are not identified. Template is not submitted, or template does not clearly present the social determinants that underpin the narratives highlighted. Written submission does not meet academic expectations and/or word count requirements. |
|
10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 2
Highlight the impact on health outcomes for the individual based on the social determinants that underpin their narrative. Use evidence to support these impacts. The writing in this section follows academic conventions with sentence structure, grammar and spelling, and adheres to word count and referencing requirements. |
| 10 to >8.5 Pts
High Distinction
Response provides an excellent written account of the impact on health outcomes for the individual demonstrating thoughtfulness and sophisticated consideration. Academic expression is articulate and very well developed. |
8.5 to >7.4 Pts
Distinction
Response provides a very good written account of the impact on health outcomes for the individual demonstrating thoughtfulness and thorough consideration. Academic expression is articulate and well developed. |
7.4 to >6.4 Pts
Credit
Response provides a good written account of the impact on health outcomes for the individual. Academic expression enables the impacts to be explored with clarity, some errors in grammar, spelling or referencing may be noted. |
6.4 to >5.0 Pts
Pass
Response provides a satisfactory written account of the impact on health outcomes for the individual. Impacts can be identified, and some foundational analysis is evident. |
5 to >0 Pts
Fail
Impact on health outcomes for the individual absent or does not provide satisfactory written account of the impact on health outcomes for the individual based on the social determinants that underpin their narrative; written submission does not meet academic expectations and/or word count and referencing requirements. |
|
10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 3
Reflect on this experience of listening to and analysing other people’s narratives. Think about and discuss the impact it will have for your future practice.
The writing in this section follows academic conventions with sentence structure, grammar and spelling, and adheres to word count. |
| 10 to >8.5 Pts
High Distinction
Reflection on the experience of listening to and analysing other people’s narratives is excellent. Reflection demonstrates thoughtfulness and thought about future practice shows sophisticated consideration. Academic expression is articulate and very well developed. |
8.5 to >7.4 Pts
Distinction
Reflection on the experience of listening to and analysing other people’s narratives is very good. Reflection demonstrates thoughtfulness and thought about future practice is thoroughly considered. Academic expression is articulate and well developed. |
7.4 to >6.4 Pts
Credit
Reflection on the experience of listening to and analysing other people’s narratives is good. Reflection can be identified and thought about future practice is evident. Academic expression enables the reflection to be explored with clarity, some errors in grammar, spelling or referencing may be noted. |
6.4 to >5.0 Pts
Pass
Reflection on the experience of listening to and analysing other people’s narratives is satisfactory. Reflection can be identified and some thought about future practice is evident. |
5 to >0 Pts
Fail
Reflection on the experience of listening to and analysing other people’s narratives absent or does not provide satisfactory written account; written submission does not meet academic expectations and/or word count. |
|
10 pts |
| Total points: 30 |
Firefighters https://iview.abc.net.au/video/LE1917H001S00 (Links to an external site.)
HIV Positive https://iview.abc.net.au/video/LE1917H005S00
Watch ABOVE VIDEO AND ALSO CAN BE WATCHED ON UTUBE
SUBMISSION: use APA FORMAT, DOUBLE SPACED , NEW TIMES ROMAN